Instead, they are upgraded to the first beta of the next release once released. #The seamonkey project upgrade#Consequently, users on the beta channel are not upgraded to the final release because they already have it when they upgrade to the final beta. they cannot be distinguished from release versions and the final beta is equal to the final release. As such, beta versions now identify themselves as release versions, i.e. Do workarounds exist? Check SeaMonkey/Troubleshooting for help General What is the difference between Release Candidates and Beta-Versions? With the adoption of the rapid release cycle, release candidates (RCs) have been replaced by beta versions. #The seamonkey project update#Since update I have some new problems with my SeaMonkey. When you go back to SeaMonkey 2.x again, you may recover your bookmarks using Tools/Restore from the Bookmarks Manager, though. If you return to SeaMonkey 2.0, due to incompatible changes to the Places back-end, you will lose your browsing history and any changes made to bookmarks. Some language packs, plugins and add-ons might also need a revert to an older version. What happens if I go back to an older version after the update? In most cases return to an older 2.x version will work without bigger problems. In contrast the update to SeaMonkey 2.0 migrated (copied) the whole profile. The update from SeaMonkey 2.0 to 2.x will just convert your bookmarks (silently and only once). Is the update from SeaMonkey 2.0 to 2.x as complicated as the update from SeaMonkey 1.x to 2.0? No. It is a good idea to read the release notes before updating, as any known issues or additional steps will be documented there. But normally the update from one SeaMonkey version to more current version will work flawlessly. Updating What should I do before updating? You can backup your profile, just to be safe. The user-centric SeaMonkey Help website, run by Chris Ilias, provides screen casts and explanations for many SeaMonkey-related issues.If you have questions of general interest but no answer yet, please add it to the Discussion page instead. Since this is a Wiki page, anyone with an account can modify it.This page is also available in other languages: German (Deutsch), Spanish (Español).SeaMonkey User FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) 1 SeaMonkey User FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions). #The seamonkey project software#It now feels more like a corporation making software as a chore rather than making it 'straight out of the heart'. While they still seem to care about the open web and Firefox, that passion for making the internet a better place has faded significantly. Some for the better, and many ways for worse. I know this is a long post and that most people in Mozilla are more concerned with Firefox but I started using Firefox at a time (2008) when the organization promoted the other products more often. Will the SeaMonkey council and Thunderbird project separate themselves from Mozilla eventually? I get that Firefox is their flagship product that impacts the most people but I still do not like how Mozilla is treating the SeaMonkey council and the Thunderbird project. It seems that for the past four to six years, Mozilla has been focusing more on Firefox than Thunderbird or SeaMonkey. Will Thunderbird and or SeaMonkey adopt the Photon UI in Firefox? If not, what would the implications be for having inconsistent UIs? Given that Thunderbird supports extensions will Thunderbird adopt the WebExtensions API? I heard that the Thunderbird project is facing similar issues. Personal: Can a SeaMonkey user tell me about how and why the like the suite so I can understand why some people value it? What will happen to SeaMonkey in the near future and it's leadership? How will they rewrite SeaMonkey to bring it up to par with Firefox 57+ given the limited resources or SeaMonkey? Will SeaMonkey adopt electrolysis (mutli-process tab isolation)? SeaMonkey is making some revenue through a sponsorship with DuckDuckGo as the default search engine.īut I am confused on some things and I would appreciate answers to them please.ĭoes SeaMonkey currently support WebExtensions or will so in the future? They would need to migrate off XUL and implement some kind of compatibility with e10s or the suite might not survive for much longer. This can be very problematic for the SeaMonkey community (regardless of how small it is) since the development of the internet suite is dependent on the who writes the code.Īlso, it seems that they have little resources to do a rewrite of SeaMonkey to bring it up to par with Firefox 57+. I noticed that the development team (which consists of less than 12 people) is struggling to keep up with bug fixes and newer features to the Gecko engine. From my understanding, they are autonomous from Mozilla and are mostly on their own in terms of development. It seems that the SeaMonkey council is facing some serious problems with the future and sustainability of the project.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |